Editorial policy

Bold Coaching Journal aims to explain coaching ideas clearly, compare options fairly and keep claims proportionate. We value useful distinctions over grand promises, and readers should be able to see what a piece does and does not establish.

Accuracy and review

Articles are written to make their reasoning and scope clear. We check factual statements against suitable material where needed, distinguish interpretation from fact, and avoid presenting personal opinion as established evidence. We do not invent research, credentials, case histories or results.

Independence and partnerships

Editorial decisions remain separate from commercial arrangements. Any paid, partner-supported or otherwise commercially connected material is clearly labelled so readers can distinguish it from independent editorial coverage. Partnerships do not buy favourable editorial conclusions.

Corrections

If a reader spots a material error, they can contact us with the article and the point at issue. We review correction requests and amend confirmed errors clearly; a correction does not silently turn an opinion into a fact.

Illustrations and scope

Some illustrations may be AI-generated and are not documentary evidence. Images are not a substitute for reporting or proof. Coverage is educational and general; it is not therapy, diagnosis, professional coaching or specialist advice.